Tinder and Happn seem to offer similar features and aim at the same target audience. They are based on geographical proximity, where contact is created after validation of the two people via the photo (or they must both “match” or have a mutual “crush”). However, are they that alike, or are there some significant differences between the platforms that will make you love one and hate another?
Happn is a French start-up that rivals the American giant that is Tinder. But then what are the specific characteristics of these two applications? This review is based on various users’ live feedback, articles published in reputable sources, and our analysis. The good thing is that these apps seem to be great ego boosters. Besides, they genuinely help people meet.
You can meet users that you would never get to know in real life, make friends, and find a one-night stand. Swipe or like profiles and receive likes. Isn’t this attention what you have been dreaming of? Of course, but which app is more effective then? You will find the answer to this question in our Happn vs Tinder
Differences between Tinder and Happn include:
More about Happn
Happn’s logo is a soft blue heart inserted in a white cloud symbolizing the message. This logo refers to online love. It inspires to create new romantic relationships. Happn’s slogan is “Find Who You Meet,” which means the people you find on the app are people you want to find. The app works by geolocation. If someone lives in Paris in the 9th circle, they will find people who live in the same place: people who may regularly meet on the same route. One of the differences between Tinder and Happn is that on Tinder, you can use a “Passport” feature and change your location. Then, you can meet people around the world. But will they be glad to find out you are not actually from their city?
More about Tinder
Tinder’s logo is the app’s name with a dot on the “I,” a red flame. This logo is simple, but the flame detail refers to the raw desire users are looking for (seduction, flirt, and sex). In case you wonder which app to choose for relationships without obligations — Happn or Tinder, choose the latter. Tinder has the slogan “It starts here,” which shows that the users are unknown. Tinder is truly a dating app. We can find known people (friends, colleagues) but especially strangers because the users are not necessarily people we have met and want to find. You can be surprised by a profile and click on it by pure chance.
Tinder is a fun productivity app that turns romance into a product. We think that in the Happn vs Tinder battle, the second one wins for men. Creating your profile is writing an advertisement of yourself, showing yourself as an ideal potential partner, as a fantasy. Women carefully fill out their profiles, and men are free to choose.
Tinder allows users to get insides about which type of photos were more successful and how to upgrade their profile. As if the simplicity of the interface offered by Tinder responded to a sort of inherent, evident magic of encounter and attraction helps it win in this section of our Happn vs. Tinder comparison. Suffice to say that your bio and profile answers should be short, so men love it. By dint of simplification, Tinder seems to have rejected any friction, to the detriment of the service it wishes to render to those who use it.
This platform also provides services for seduction and has developed dedicated services aimed at improving user experience. Happn vs. Tinder: the difference also lies in the matching process. For instance, TinderUs helps create a more attractive profile, or BroApp, which offers to send teaser messages for you to start the conversation.
One software developer, Justin Long, even described on his blog how he “automated” his use of Tinder, implementing facial recognition software to sort profiles and a robot to initiate conversations for him. He has since made it into a program, Bernie, a customizable matchmaker who configures itself to initiate meetings and swipe profiles for you according to your recommendations. If you like to praise your ego or you are a typical American man, choose Tinder.
“Why should we go on dating sites and search for strangers when we meet so many new people every day, in real life?” — women often register on a dating site with this thought in mind. Both Tinder and Happn give users a new superpower: that of finding someone you met on the street. That was how Happn was born in January 2014, in Paris (France). Here’s why we think it will be better for women.
Happn uses its GPS all the time. To appear on your timeline, the person must be connected to the application, have the same preferences as you, and you must have crossed that person’s path. You can’t search to find someone, but if you know roughly the time and place where you secreted, you can scroll through your timeline to find the person again. These conditions provide women with much safety and reassure them that all matches are real and spontaneous. Happn or Tinder? If you prefer real-life experiences instead of automized matches, choose Happn.
That is, Happn shows how many minutes ago (in this case, when) you were very close. It may be someone you know a little bit, because you attend the same gym, college, course, or who works in the same region as you. Or a total stranger, but who has a lot in common to share about his routine. As you can see, the app is not as rough as Tinder. On Happn, you have time to relax, seek romance, and fill out your profile as if you would tell a new friend about yourself.
People on Happn seek sex less often than on Tinder. If you object to random one-night stand meetings, choose this app. It will allow you to immerse into a friendly atmosphere and be less pathetic fully. The audience is equally distributed between men and women, but their purposes are vaster.
According to a study carried out by the firm GlobalWebIndex (GWI), which covered more than 47,000 users:
They are 62% men against 38% women. The users are relatively young:
In Asia, Happn has already spread to Hong Kong, Manila, and Bangkok. Since 2016, the app has been successfully matching people in Tokyo. The majority of registrants come from large cities, where you are more likely to meet different people.
In terms of their purposes, people on Happn are looking for THE great story. But in the meantime, accept and assume to find something else, so sex is also among vital priorities. Today there is a real demand for networking between available people: this is offered by both Tinder and Happn apps. Sex without a future is as old as the world, but now it becomes commonplace, assumes itself, even asserts itself. Tinder is more suitable for this task, and its audience fully understands the apps’ purpose.
According to an Ifop study, the proportion of users of dating sites admitting to looking only for relationships without obligations has risen sharply over the past five years, from 22% in 2015 to almost double (48%) in 2020. Almost half of the people admit having already had sex on the first date knowing in advance that they were not going to see this person again (47%) or without then seeking to see this person again (46%). To avoid short-lived adventures and promote stable and lasting relationships, choose the second one in the Tinder and Happn battle.
If usability is your main criteria, you shouldn’t choose between Happn or Tinder. Both applications are easy to use and provide many features for free, unlike dating sites where you have to pay to meet people. Tinder and Happn are a real fashion phenomenon. Finding love becomes “easy.” Getting to know the other, gaining their trust, and seducing a person is fact and easy now.
The whole Tinder is easy: hundreds of beautiful girls available. Dating sites have been around for many years, and it doesn’t make anyone laugh in the sense that most registrants feel ashamed that they have to register on a dating site to find love. Whereas in Tinder and Happn, there is no shame since it is all the rage. It only takes five minutes to register on Happn or Tinder, and you are ready to go.
The “Boost” feature on Tinder allows your profile to be more visible for a limited time. The “Passport” tool enables you to choose any city for matching and explore people around the world. Even if Tinder does not target them directly, the paid features mainly help straight men, for whom Tinder is not as easy a playground as it is for women, as several studies show. Let’s compare Tinder and Happn. Here are the prices for the Tinder services:
Tinder is more affordable.
Happn vs. Tinder in terms of their weak and strong sides
|Free to for women||Men have to pay to register.|
|Easy to use||Urban target, little choice for rural populations|
|Promotes good encounters.||Simplified use that does not allow you to invest in the person on whom we have a “crush” or a “match.”|
|Suitable for speedy appointments.||The cross-path selection system eliminates choice.|
|Opportunity to block unwanted profiles|
|Quality over quantity of favorites.|
|Free registration for all||The focus is on the physical and the tastes of the person.|
|Tinder is more affordable than Happn.||There is no interest at all in the personality.|
|It is globally known and accepted.||Profiles are entirely devoid of useful information.|
|Perfect for one-night stands.||You can get addicted to swiping and waste hours.|
|It is a vast user base, given that the application works by geographic proximity (with geolocation).|
|The ability to be active in the “boost” mode maximizes the chances of having a “match.”|
Happn is less raw than Tinder which specializes in one-night stands. On Tinder, you get a high density of users, which guarantees you at least one meeting, even in the middle of the countryside. You can see several photos (linked to the Facebook profile) that offer the person’s physique integrity.
Happn promises you to find this love at first sight seen at the office and McDonald’s intersection. But if you want to find love with Happn, you will have to leave your house: if you stay at home, you will not meet anyone. Tinder and Happn differ in their approaches. On Happn, geolocation is more precise because it works in real-time and within a perimeter of fewer than 250 meters against 2 to 5 kilometers for Tinder.
Happn is more intimate and personalized than its rival. It allows users to meet people who frequent the same places as them, and therefore have the same tastes. To choose Happn or Tinder depends only on you. Make this choice based on your preferences. Hopefully, our review has helped you in this matter.